Download A Simple Proof of Rationality of Siegel-Weil Eisenstein by Harris M. PDF

By Harris M.

Best nonfiction_1 books

Racing in the Street: The Bruce Springsteen Reader

For greater than 3 a long time, Bruce Springsteen’s skill to specific in phrases and track the private hopes, fears, loves, and sorrows of common american citizens has made him a hero to his hundreds of thousands of dedicated fanatics. Racing on the street is the 1st entire choice of writings approximately Springsteen, that includes the main insightful, revealing, well-known, and notorious articles, interviews, studies, and different writings.

Wrightscapes - Frank Lloyd Wrights LandscapeDesigns

Here's the 1st e-book to ascertain the environmental panorama designs of Frank Lloyd Wright, most likely the world's top recognized and so much influential architect. WRIGHTSCAPES analyzes eighty five of his works, and can pay specific cognizance to web site making plans, panorama layout, group scale, and nearby making plans.

Extra resources for A Simple Proof of Rationality of Siegel-Weil Eisenstein Series(en)(33s)

Sample text

HK] M. Harris, S. Kudla, On a conjecture of Jacquet, in H. Hida, D. Ramakrishnan, F. , Contributions to automorphic forms, geometry, and number theory (volume in honor of J. Shalika), 355-371 (2004) [HKS] M. Harris, S. Kudla, W. J. Sweet, Theta dichotomy for unitary groups, JAMS, 9 (1996) 941-1004. [HKS] M. Harris, S. Zucker, Boundary Cohomology of Shimura Varieties, III, M´emoires Soc. Math. France, 85 (2001). [Ho] R. , 880 (1980) 211-248. [I1] A. Ichino, A regularized Siegel-Weil formula for unitary groups, Math.

1]. For general W , we can take Kh to be the stabilizer of the diagonal hermitian form diag(a1 , . . , an ) where ai ∈ Q, ai > 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ r, ai < 0, r + 1 ≤ i ≤ n. The exact choice of hermitian form has no bearing on rationality, though it may be relevant to integrality questions. With respect to the canonical embedding of Shimura data (G(U (W ) × U (−W )), Xr,s × Xs,r ) → (H, Xn,n ) we may assume KH ⊃ (Kh × Kh ) ∩ H. 1)], we may assume that the point (h, h) maps to hH . This antiholomorphic map is the restriction to Xr,s of a K-rational isomorphism ∼ φr,s : RK/Q (Xr,s ) −→ RK/Q (Xs,r ).

W] A. , 113 (1965) 1-87.